<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review of Effectuation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.billerickson.net/review-of-effectuation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.billerickson.net/review-of-effectuation/</link>
	<description>WordPress Consulting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:58:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart Read</title>
		<link>http://www.billerickson.net/review-of-effectuation/comment-page-1/#comment-1485</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Read</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jan 2011 15:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billerickson.net/?p=1102#comment-1485</guid>
		<description>Hello all - the Bird in Hand principle is intended to describe the effectual principle of starting with your Means.  The connection being starting with the Bird you have in your Hand - the means you have immediately available.  Crazy Quilt is intended to reflect the collage the multiple partners co-create using the various means at their disposal.  The terminology is probably confusing, but more important than the terms are the ideas behind them.  If youd like to see a brief video illustrating the principles, I just found a new one up from the Netherlands at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TIXVe4nEDEE.  Hope this helps!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello all &#8211; the Bird in Hand principle is intended to describe the effectual principle of starting with your Means.  The connection being starting with the Bird you have in your Hand &#8211; the means you have immediately available.  Crazy Quilt is intended to reflect the collage the multiple partners co-create using the various means at their disposal.  The terminology is probably confusing, but more important than the terms are the ideas behind them.  If youd like to see a brief video illustrating the principles, I just found a new one up from the Netherlands at: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TIXVe4nEDEE" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TIXVe4nEDEE</a>.  Hope this helps!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: usmita afrose</title>
		<link>http://www.billerickson.net/review-of-effectuation/comment-page-1/#comment-329</link>
		<dc:creator>usmita afrose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 18:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billerickson.net/?p=1102#comment-329</guid>
		<description>Mr. Erickson
I think there is a confusion(probable mistake by you) between Bird-in-hand principle and Crazy quilt principle. Because In the book of Entrepreneurship written by Robert D. Hisrich,  it is written that &#039;&quot;The patchwork (crazy) quilt principle is means-drived rather than goal drived. The emphasis is on creating something new with existing means rather than discovering new ways to achieve goals&quot;&quot;  and&quot;&quot; The bird-in-hand principle involves negotiating with all stakeholders willing to commit to a project without worrying about the opportunity costs&quot;&quot;. 
Causal v. effectual is very clearly defind. thanks for these.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Erickson<br />
I think there is a confusion(probable mistake by you) between Bird-in-hand principle and Crazy quilt principle. Because In the book of Entrepreneurship written by Robert D. Hisrich,  it is written that &#8216;&#8221;The patchwork (crazy) quilt principle is means-drived rather than goal drived. The emphasis is on creating something new with existing means rather than discovering new ways to achieve goals&#8221;"  and&#8221;" The bird-in-hand principle involves negotiating with all stakeholders willing to commit to a project without worrying about the opportunity costs&#8221;".<br />
Causal v. effectual is very clearly defind. thanks for these.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Erickson</title>
		<link>http://www.billerickson.net/review-of-effectuation/comment-page-/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Erickson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 19:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billerickson.net/?p=1102#comment-53</guid>
		<description>It was more of a mental frame of reference that better describes how an entrepreneur operates.

It made me more confident in what I&#039;ve been doing. For example, there&#039;s a project I&#039;m working on now involving life sciences technology.  We wrote a b-plan that&#039;s &quot;good enough,&quot; and now we&#039;ve started forming partnerships with companies that will benefit from our technology (and benefit us of course). Instead of paralysis by analysis, we&#039;re going around to key companies and showing them our technology. We&#039;re basically saying, &quot;We have this great hammer and we&#039;re looking for the right nails. How could this help you?&quot;

My formal business education would say we&#039;re doing this wrong - that we should do extensive market research and find the market opportunity that has the highest net present value. But seeing similarities in what we&#039;re doing and the successful entrepreneurs have done makes me more confident in my intuition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was more of a mental frame of reference that better describes how an entrepreneur operates.</p>
<p>It made me more confident in what I&#039;ve been doing. For example, there&#039;s a project I&#039;m working on now involving life sciences technology.  We wrote a b-plan that&#039;s &quot;good enough,&quot; and now we&#039;ve started forming partnerships with companies that will benefit from our technology (and benefit us of course). Instead of paralysis by analysis, we&#039;re going around to key companies and showing them our technology. We&#039;re basically saying, &quot;We have this great hammer and we&#039;re looking for the right nails. How could this help you?&quot;</p>
<p>My formal business education would say we&#039;re doing this wrong &#8211; that we should do extensive market research and find the market opportunity that has the highest net present value. But seeing similarities in what we&#039;re doing and the successful entrepreneurs have done makes me more confident in my intuition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eschipul</title>
		<link>http://www.billerickson.net/review-of-effectuation/comment-page-1/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>eschipul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 17:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billerickson.net/?p=1102#comment-52</guid>
		<description>Love this type of logic &quot;What can I do with these means?&quot;

It would also be interesting to hear what concrete actions or behaviors you changed as a result of this? Or did it drift back to being a mental frame of reference, but not one that led to immediate changes? Just curious...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love this type of logic &quot;What can I do with these means?&quot;</p>
<p>It would also be interesting to hear what concrete actions or behaviors you changed as a result of this? Or did it drift back to being a mental frame of reference, but not one that led to immediate changes? Just curious&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

